WebSep 29, 2024 · In 2016 the Wellcome Trust (which also funds eLife) launched Wellcome Open Research on the F1000 platform, and the Gates Foundation and the UCL Great … WebThis hypothesis was tested and refuted by the editors of Acta Neuropathologica in a 2008 editorial. (Incidentally, this journal had an average time from submission to first decision of around 17 days between 2005 and 2007, which is pretty fast.) The editorial says “Because in this journal all reviews are rated from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), we ...
Making decisions based on how we feel about memories, not accuracy
WebOct 26, 2024 · From January 31, 2024, eLife will instead publish every paper it reviews as a Reviewed Preprint, a new type of research output that combines the manuscript with … WebRT @StearnsLab: My experience with the new model at @eLife: Submitted on Dec. 27, requested new model Reviews in two months later on Feb. 27 Paper still at “drafting decision” on March 27 3 months in and nothing from eLife. chantal orlans
PNAS or elife? ResearchGate
WebMar 15, 2016 · eLife publishes the most substantive parts of the decision letter after review, along with the associated author responses, to provide greater context for the work and … WebDec 8, 2016 · In the second quarter of 2016, the median time to decision after peer review was 31 days, with 75% of authors receiving the decision within 41 days. Factors that affect these times include the … WebOct 31, 2024 · Overview of the new process In brief, the five steps in the new process will be as follows 1:. Submission: eLife editors select submitted papers for review. Peer Review: Experts in the field review the selected papers and provide a public review and confidential feedback to the author. A publication fee is also collected from the author at this point. chantal oudry